Om Namah Shivaya

Om Namah Shivaya

I'll be grateful if you...

Showing posts with label Stephen Hawking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Hawking. Show all posts

Jul 11, 2015

EVOLUTION - A Work In Progress and GOD is the end result…

Talking about Evolution today i.e. 10th July, seems quite apt, given that this day in 1925, the Trial of Century, TheScope’s trial also dubbed as The Monkey Trial began, which brought the controversies surrounding around Theory of Evolution, in the forefront of public interest. This trial set Modernists, who said evolution was not inconsistent with religion against Fundamentalists, who said the word of God as revealed in the Bible took priority over all human knowledge.

As "Darwinism" became widely accepted in
the 1870s, caricatures of 
Charles Darwin
with an ape or 
monkeybody
symbolised 
evolution
IMAGE Curtsy Wikipedia
For quiet sometime, I have been thinking about the Darwinism - The theory of Evolution, as it has put some serious question mark to the idea of GOD. Some of the top scientists of the world have denied it and the most celebrated scientist of the century, Stephen Hawking has said, "The God Does Not Exist" (Click here to read my thoughts about the statement). So here are some of my thoughts about why I feel that Evolution will eventually bring us face to face with the Universal Consciousness, which some of us believe is the direct representation of the Word ‘God’.

To begin with, there has always been some question about the many sharp turns evolution took on it’s own as well as through some quirks of fate, e.g. almost 70,000 years ago, a super volcano erupted in Indonesia, which brought the human population at the time to 3,000 -10,000 across the planet. What if the things would have happened slightly different at each turn of Evolution, lucky or not?

The professor of Paleobiology, Conway Morris of the Cambridge University says that Evolution is not random but strongly constrained. Wherever any environmental niches existed, evolution found a way to fill them with the appropriate creatures. So to my mind that brings Nature into focus that creates a space for something to flourish. Richard Dawkins of the God Delusion fame says that the eyes have evolved over 40 times, whereas the intelligence was given the short shrift by Evolution, as if it was not a good idea at all.

A reconstruction of "Lucy,"
a female 
Australopithecus afarensis
Curtsy Wikipedia
Yet, through out the human evolution history, biological changes ran along with technological changes. Brains did increase in size, where evolution put layers upon layer of structure over the ancient brain across multiple ‘human like’ species. And an arms race erupted within the human species, where the winner was Homo Sapiens with it’s better cognitive capacity; the ability to project one self into future through thinking, memory etc and was able to share its triumphs across the species with the unique evolution of Language. Along with this breakthrough, came the cultural evolution that put the Homo sapiens into the forefront of forming  societies, which made the 'physical power' less important for the survival. We stood up on our legs for long range visual area for hunt or escape; dropped off our fur-coat, made possible by the discovery of fire; sustaining and creating it; shortcomings of physical strength overcome by better brains etc.

Darwin, what he called as ‘descent with modification’, proclaimed that over the long period of evolution, brains changed too. Process of natural selections was modifying the old versions of brain and we became the product of brains that survived the survival game and in turn passed on the bigger and better brains to the next generation. This passing on phenomenon was probably one of the reasons, Darwin did not publish his manuscript for 17 years, since he was not sure about the process of this handover. However, as Prof. Daniel M Ogilvie says in one of his lecture, Darwin somehow understood what was happening and talked about the invisible characters in the sperm and the egg.

Reconstruction of Homo heidelbergensis
which may be the direct ancestor of both

 Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens.
IMAGE Curtsy Wikipedia
Looking at the long natural history of humankind, we certainly did not always have brains that could do complex things, think complex thoughts and ideas. We probably did not even have the awareness about consciousness. We didn’t thought of 'mind' or even the ability to make up something like the 'idea of soul'. These came into existence over long periods of time. From the physical point of view, we are not so formidable as independent physical entity, which creates a doubt about our continued existence? Darwin reasoned that it’s because we have developed not only into a highly social creature but also an intelligent species.

A Guide in Shanghai @ Shashi
Some animals survive on their strength of camouflage but human kind’s biggest survival tool is intelligence and that led to an enormous pressure on evolution to develop bigger and better brains. But as the process of birth goes, evolution could not go on increasing size to add more and more neurons into our head, which needs to fit into the mother’s pelvis. At that stage of development, quoting Prof Daniel Ogilvie "Evolution came up with its single most important evolutionary solution by providing human species with longer childhood". This growth period, in some cases stretching up to 30 years, gave us the time required to develop a highly complex brain. During this growing up period, we fill our brains with the experiences of our individual lifetime. In another interesting development, the evolution chose to allocate relatively huge areas of our brains to intricate and well-designed system for processing language and visual inputs, probably the most detailed physical skills that we as humans can do.

Which brings us to the modern man of the 21st century. But the evolution has not stopped in its track. It is still working on evolving, in it’s own languid pace, as we zip around in our own day to day business and information over drive of cyber space.


IMAGE : Vagamon Kerala @ Shashi
We have shed our physical prowess as more and more we used our intellect to survive, coupled with the growth of our brains. In my opinion, the next logical step of evolution should be to free us from the constraints of the physicality of the brain itself. Which leads me to believe that we are on the path to be further evolved at the higher planes of existence and eventually as pure consciousness, where seeing and information dissemination will be not be done at physical level but at the energy level. At that stage of evolution, we would be able to communicate at far greater speed with far wider reach within that evolved form of being. Eventually the evolution will lead to the formation of a collective consciousness, which sometimes is called the Supreme Being – which I would love to call ‘GOD’.

__
Shashi 
ॐ नमः शिवाय
Om Namah Shivaya


PREV                                HOME                              NEXT
The God Does Not Exist                    The Big Bang & Eternal sound 'OM'

Jun 9, 2013

TALKING POINT : Einstein and Tagore on Music - 19th August 1930

“The difficulty is that the really good music, whether of the East or of the West, cannot be analyzed.” Einstein

I have had posted Nobel Laureate Rabindra Nath Tagore’s meeting with Einstein earlier where he talked about Truth, Reality and Beauty. (Click here to read it) and the talk below is his second meeting with Einstein, on 19th August, 1930. 

In the first instance, the meeting has Einstein questioning Tagore on his belief on divine and whether God is isolated from the world, to which Tagore replied, “When our universe is in harmony with man, the eternal, we know it as truth, we feel it as beauty”. Where as the second, as excerpted below, mainly centered around Modern Physics and Music.

Einstein and Tagore Curtsy Mokta Mona

“In creation we follow the central law of existence, but if we do not cut ourselves adrift from it, we can have sufficient freedom within the limits of our personality for the fullest self-expression.” Tagore

Bertrand Russel said once for Tagore, “I regret I cannot agree with Tagore. His talk about the infinite is vague nonsense. The sort of language that is admired by many Indians unfortunately does not, in fact, mean anything at all.”

And I believe that people like him, are governed by the five senses for perception and when those sense perception fails in perceiving truthfully (Like a spoon in a glass of water seems to be broken) they go around finding the reason behind it and sometimes find it (As in case of broken spoon – Laws of refractions) but if they don’t, they refuse to acknowledge it the truth (That the spoon is actually not broken) till the time another person comes with another set of laws.

Scientists and logicians are handicapped by the limitations of sense perception. I am happy that someone like Einstein has the humility to accept it and some like Stephen Hawking (He went on to famously proclaim, “God Does Not Exist” click here to read… )feel that what they know, is absolute truth.

Divine is nothing but collective consciousness of the Universe, including mine. To know that Universal consciousness, one has to go within to up-link  that’s what I believe in, whether it means anything to people like Bertrand Russel, Stephen Hawking etc. or not.

Anyways, here is the part of the talk curtsy Mukto Mona… on Music.  To read the full talk, please click here…

EINSTEIN AND TAGORE ON MODERN PHYSICS, MUSIC ETC.
Excerpted from "Three conversations: Tagore Talks with Einstein, with Rolland, and Wells"  (ASIA 3/1931, p.139-143,196 f.)
Einstein and Tagore Curtsy Ms. Sabina Choudhary

EINSTEIN: I believe that whatever we do or live for has its causality; it is good, however, that we cannot see through to it.

TAGORE: There is in human affairs an element of elasticity also, some freedom within a small range which is for the expression of our personality. It is like the musical system in India, which is not so rigidly fixed as western music. Our composers give a certain definite outline, a system of melody and rhythmic arrangement, and within a certain limit the player can improvise upon it. He must be one with the law of that particular melody, and then he can give spontaneous expression to his musical feeling within the prescribed regulation. We praise the composer for his genius in creating a foundation along with a superstructure of melodies, but we expect from the player his own skill in the creation of variations of melodic flourish and ornamentation. In creation we follow the central law of existence, but if we do not cut ourselves adrift from it, we can have sufficient freedom within the limits of our personality for the fullest self-expression.

EINSTEIN: It requires a very high standard of art to realize fully the great idea in the original music, so that one can make variations upon it. In our country, the variations are often prescribed.

TAGORE: If in our conduct we can follow the law of goodness, we can have real liberty of self-expression. The principle of conduct is there, but the character which makes it true and individual is our own creation. In our music there is a duality of freedom and prescribed order.

EINSTEIN: Are the words of a song also free? I mean to say, is the singer at liberty to add his own words to the song which he is singing?

TAGORE: Yes. In Bengal we have a kind of song-kirtan, we call it-which gives freedom to the singer to introduce parenthetical comments, phrases not in the original song. This occasions great enthusiasm, since the audience is constantly thrilled by some beautiful, spontaneous sentiment added by the singer.
EINSTEIN: Can the Indian music be sung without words? Can one understand a song without words?

TAGORE: Yes, we have songs with unmeaning words, sounds which just help to act as carriers of the notes. In North India, music is an independent art, not the interpretation of words and thoughts, as in Bengal. The music is very intricate and subtle and is a complete world of melody by itself.

TAGORE: Melody and harmony are like lines and colors in pictures. A simple linear picture may be completely beautiful; the introduction of color may make it vague and insignificant. Yet color may, by combination with lines, create great pictures, so long as it does not smother and destroy their value. 

EINSTEIN: It is a beautiful comparison; line is also much older than color. It seems that your melody is much richer in structure than ours. Japanese music also seems to be so.

EINSTEIN: The difficulty is that the really good music, whether of the East or of the West, cannot be analyzed.

TAGORE: Yes, and what deeply affects the hearer is beyond himself.

EINSTEIN: The same uncertainty will always be there about everything fundamental in our experience, in our reaction to art, whether in Europe or in Asia. Even the red flower I see before me on your table may not be the same to you and me.

TAGORE: And yet there is always going on the process of reconciliation between them, the individual taste conforming to the universal standard.

__
Shashi
ॐ नमः शिवाय
Om Namah Shivaya

PREV                                HOME                              NEXT

Dec 31, 2011

21st Edition of Shadow Dancing With Mind

HAPPY NEW YEAR

BLESSINGS FROM BODH GAYA
Enjoy the journey... to the place where Buddha attained
enlightenment...
Click Here

Welcome to 21st Edition of “Shadow Dancing With Mind”. This Edition has the following topics.

TALKING POINT
Some of the things that is happening around me, as I get into the daily grind of my life every day, which has made to stop and then think....

As someone who dabbles in various forms of Haiku, Poetry and writing, (but not very good at talking about it or reading it aloud to a group of friends or audience) I was not sure how a poem is performed or what actually is a performing poet. Then I came across this TEDx Talk by Sarah Kay today. Well, it changed the way I look at poetry... It’s an amazing .. Must watch the video...
Click here to read more...

Recently, I came across a beautiful documentary by Discovery Channel hosted by Stephen Hawking asking a question that has remain unanswered since the beginning of mankind, “Does a "God" or a "Celestial Dictator" exist? In this documentary, as described in the write up, Stephen Hawking dissects the science of the universe in answering this very fundamental question.


UP CLOSE & PERSONAL
The section gives you insights of some of the people I have had a chance to meet, interact or have read about that have made a deep impression on my thoughts and feelings...


Recently I came across an interesting and typical new-age commune located in the Alps of Italy, Damanhur. Some consider the Temple structure buried 100 ft under a hill, (constructed in secret by Amateurs over a period of 13 years, without any drawings and plans) 8th Wonder of the world. In exploring further, I realise the beauty of the self made architecture  as well as the guiding philosophy of the commune i.e. The Damanhurians see the temple as a pathway to the divine inside and outside of one's self. (From the book "Damanhur Temples of Humankind"). So here is an introduction... for you to explore further and possibly move in..


Yesterday, 10th Dec, 2011 was an interesting day. It was the day of longest Moon Eclipse as well as the day when I met, for the first time, Mr. Wilbur Smith. He was the one author; I followed and read for the longest period of my life. Wilbur Smith’s books got me to appreciate nature through wild life and savannahs of Africa which later got engraved more firmly in my inner psyche through my spiritual forays into Himalaya’s and grew deeper routes through books like Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra

STILL LIFE
A place where I take you with me to a journey through my impressions and pictures that I have had taken...

One of the most revered holy sites associated with Buddha - Bodh Gaya, the place where Prince Siddhartha attained enlightenment. Since I have special affinity for the thoughts of Buddha from childhood, (I was born in Kushinagar Distt in Uttar Pradesh INDIA – where Lord Buddha attained Nirvana - click here to journey with me to that place as well...) I enjoyed the powerful spiritual energy that permeates in each and everything in and around the temple.  Specially, sitting under the Boddhi Tree in meditation, was a serene and spiritually uplifting experience. 

WHISPERS
A section where I post my poetry, Haiku and verse’s about love, life and living....

I believe that sometimes we cherish pain and selfishly hold on to it till it becomes intrinsic part of our soul... Love has that effect in leaving... in emptying...

I believe that we are not living in now, as our mind is not capable of perceiving it as it is always busy experiencing, accumulating memories and then translating the present according to it...

Sharing some Haiku about life and living along with a verse about what actually it is that ‘is’... 

On the way to Delhi, going for one of my projects at Chandigarh (North India) from Chennai, I see the wings of the plane moving and felt like earth moved, though it actually did not. It triggered a thought process in me and I realised that all our life, we try or we move but actually we don’t...

Inspired by some the protagonists of Secessionist Movement from Vienna, namely Gustav Klimt and Egon Schiele. To read more of my thoughts on the movement and see some amazing paintings (including the world’s costliest painting sold)...

Sitting under that Boddhi Tree, I had some thoughts about love, life and living. The Haiku below are some of those expressions. The longer verse ‘Buddha Song’ is entwined echoes of two different feelings that played within me... at the time

__________________________
Hope you will enjoy this edition... look forward to your comments and visit to the next Edition... please click on the “Join this Site” button on the right hand side top corner to follow my activities...
__________________
Shashi @ Dec 2011
नमः शिवाय
Om Namah Shivaya
PREV                                     HOME                                       NEXT
20th Edition

Dec 3, 2011

TALKING POINT: "GOD does not EXIST" says Brilliant scientist Stephen Hawking

Recently, I came across a beautiful documentary by Discovery Channel hosted by Stephen Hawking asking a question that has remain unanswered since the beginning of mankind, “Does a "God" or a "Celestial Dictator" exist? In this documentary, as described in the write up, Stephen Hawking dissects the science of the universe in answering this very fundamental question.



I liked the documentary... (must see it as its beautifully crafted though its more than 42 minutes long) and enjoyed the simple explanation Stephen Hawking gave for Non-existence of GOD (Or the creator of Big Bang)... but I do not quite agree to it. His explanation refuting the existence of God on the basis of “Human perception of Cause and Effect" was not convincing enough for me. May be its because I am just a layman - not a scientist, as every one else is who are supporting this theory. But then what is human perception. Its just something that our senses keep our mind wondering and in constant chaos, decieving us all the time?

At the 37th minute into the documentary, Stephen Hawking says, “"The role played by time at the beginning of the Universe is, I believe, the final key for removing the need for a Grand Designer, and revealing how the universe created itself. You can't get back to the time before Big Bang, because there is no BEFORE" and then goes on to say, “We have finally found something that does not have cause because there is no time for cause to exist in. For me, this means there is no possibility of a creator, because there is no "time" for a creator to exist in"

But in my opinion, why there has to be a 'time', as perceived by scientist now, to create a cause?

Well personally I don't think so as
1)    The word "TIME" is not the Time, just like the word "Tree" is not the tree.
2)    Time is a concept created by man to understand the physical laws governing nature. And as the very nature of concepts is, that it can and will change over time by new discoveries, new insights and new human endeavours. So time per se cannot be a constant thing as constant as Mass, Energy and Space, in definition, and cannot be used as an argument to declare God's existence or not, just by declaring that TIME does not exist beyond Big Bang, as Stephen Hawkins has declared in this documentary.

I believe in the "Cyclic model” which means that Universe is constantly expanding and contracting. More recent work has suggested the problem (That Cosmological constant is not actually constant) may be indirect evidence of a cyclic universe possibility as allowed by string theory. With every cycle of the universe (Big Bang then eventually a Big Crunch) taking about a trillion years. Just like Einstein many scientists assume some things like Cosmological Constant (To which Einstein later referred to his failure to predict the expansion of the universe from theory as the "Biggest Blunder of his life". Well a very interesting read at Wikipedia – Click here to read) or let’s say, as Stephen Hawking say, Time = 0 at big bang.

My brother Animesh has shared an another beautiful documentary by Carl Sagan "Hindu Concept of the Beginning and End of Universe" where he says "Hindu religion is the only religion in the world dedicated to the idea that the cosmos itself goes under an immense infact infinite number of deaths and re-births" (Its a lovely short Video, must see if not to hear what he says, but to see one of the beautiful temple architecture from South India)



Yes, conclusive evidence is lacking but it does not mean that it’s cannot be true. Given all the best thoughts that this century’s genius scientist, Stephen Hawking could put forth and some little bit of instinctive understanding that I have, I believe in, is the fact that “we have not reached that state of scientific progress, where it can be proved scientifically and conclusively the Existence of GOD or His Non Existence”. So I will leave aside the question whether “GOD” or as Stephen Hawking says, “CELESTIAL DICTATOR” exist or Not. But I will continue to firmly believe that GOD exists and will do so, until its proven wrong.

Unlike Stephen Hawking declaring at the end of the documentary, 
“My view is that there is "No god", "No one created Universe" and "No one directs our fate"


I just have belief that
 – There is GOD - The supreme consciousness
- And some Universal Consciousness has created the Universe 
- and yes there is fate but only in this ‘now’, which is the result of Free Will governed by our 'present' Karma.
________
ॐ नमः शिवाय
Om Namah Shivaya

PREV                               HOME                                    NEXT
Nature of Reality – Einstein and Tagore
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...